A professional reader’s report on a script — logline, synopsis, comments, and a verdict such as Pass / Consider / Recommend. Inkwell’s Coverage skill produces a structured self-review in that industry shape.
Coverage exists so busy executives can decide whether to read the full script. The familiar shape -- logline, synopsis, comments, ratings, verdict -- is a decision instrument. Writers can use the same shape as a pre-submission mirror: if your own coverage cannot state the story cleanly, the draft usually is not ready.
Inkwell's Coverage skill produces a structured self-review in that industry shape so you can pressure-test clarity, character, and structure on a cold pass. It is analysis-only: it does not rewrite lines, and it is not a studio guarantee that a particular reader or company will agree with the verdict.
Read coverage for diagnosis, not for obedience. A Consider with sharp notes can be more useful than a flattering Recommend that cannot name the engine. Fix the story problems the report exposes, then run again -- or send the draft out when the synopsis and comments stop contradicting the pages.
It follows the same report shape -- top sheet, synopsis, comments, ratings, verdict -- so you can pressure-test the draft. It is still a tool you run, not a promise that a particular studio reader will agree.
No. Coverage is analysis-only. It does not change lines; it tells you how the story reads on a cold pass so you can decide what to fix.
They are classic reader verdicts. Pass declines; Consider sees potential with issues; Recommend urges a fuller read or next step. Treat them as signals, not destiny -- especially on a self-review run.
Usually no. Coverage is for your diagnosis or an assignee's internal process. Submit the script (and requested materials); do not outsource the reader's job with a leftover report.
